Timberline Eventls LLC | Finish Line Timing
 

RACE TIMING TECHNOLOGIES

Race timing has come a long way since the running boom started in the 1970's. Timing technologies have grown from stop watches, popsicle sticks, and clip boards, to very accurate disposable electronic chip timing systems. Chip timing is now considered the gold standard for mass-participation race timing. However, exploring alternatives to chip timing is prudent for race directors and organizers. This article delves into five different timing technologies to educate race directors on which technology is appropriate for their race as the primary or backup timing system.

TIMING TECHNOLOGIES To CONSIDER

While electronic chip timing systems have proved their worth, several scenarios warrant exploring alternative solutions:

  • Cost-Effectiviness and Budget: electronic chip timing systems are expensive which might burden smaller events or those on a tight budget. It is worth noting that chip timing becomes cost-effective when an event reaches 300-400 registered participants.
  • Backup Assurance: Race organizers often seek backup solutions to ensure their event's chip timing accuracy.

To address these concerns, we will explore electronic chip timing and four chip timing alternatives that offer solutions for race timing.

Electronic chip timing

Chip timing systems require that athletes wear a small, lightweight chip that uniquely identifies them as they cross strategically placed, electronic mats. In its most basic and common form, chip timing electronically handles the task of collecting and processing results at the end of the race. Chips can be worn on the participant's shoe, on the back of their bib, or wrapped around their ankle.

Race Timing Apps

Modern technology has paved the way for accurate race timing apps that turn smartphones and tablets into efficient timing tools. These apps simplify the process of recording finish times and race numbers. They allow quick data entry and offer features like pre-loading start lists for seamless operation. Additionally, many apps can upload live results, providing real-time updates to race participants.

However, it is important to note that these apps may not be the most effective solution for all events. They are most practical when an event is very small, participants are well-separated when finishing, and the event director wants to do the timing in-house. In larger or more densely populated events, these apps encounter limitations and potentially cause more problems than they solve.

Manual Race Timing

Despite technological advancements, manual race timing remains a widely practiced method. It involves manually recording finish times and bib numbers and then entering this data manually into a spreadsheet to produce race results. While this method may seem old-fashioned, it can be reliable, especially for real small races who can staff and train the people to do this. However, it's important to note that results can take quite a while to be tabulated, and errors are prevalent, so many races who used this method in the past have opted to hire professional timing companies for increased accuracy and efficiency.

Barcode-Based Solutions

Barcode timing, also known as tag-pull or pull-tag timing, offers a cost-effective solution for smaller races operating with a limited timing budget. In this method, participants are provided with bibs that have tags on the bottom, which are pulled off at the finish line chute. These tags contain barcodes that are scanned into the timing software.

It's important to note that implementing this system requires careful planning. The race organizers should be prepared to allocate 6-7 responsible volunteers who will be trained to manage the timing and the finish line. These volunteers will be responsible for collecting finish times using a computerized stopwatch like a TimeMachine, maintaining the order in which runners crossed the finish line, and collecting and stringing the tags at the exit of the runner's chute. This barcode-based solution can be efficient and cost-effective for smaller races, but proper coordination is key to its success.

Barcode or tag-pull timing can provide very accurate results almost as quickly as chip timing when done by a competent timing company who is provided responsible volunteers by the event.

CAMERA SYSTEMS

Digital photo finish systems can provide the most accurate timing results down to 1000th of a second. Camera systems are mostly used for track and field events, and finish lines where a photo finish is very likely, like bicycle races. While not the best system for mass participation events, they are an excellent backup system when used in combination with chip timing.

The Importance of Chip Timing For Recording Accurate Race Timing

While these alternatives offer viable solutions for accurate race timing, it's essential to understand the distinction between gun time and net time, or personal time. The alternatives mentioned above primarily provide just gun time results, indicating the time from the race start (when the "gun" goes off) to when each participant crosses the finish line. Net time, which is the time from when the individual crossed the start line to the time the individual crosses the finish line, can only be accurately recorded with chip timing when there are electronic timing locations at the start and finish, and is often called chip time.

Awards are based on gun time, i.e. who crosses the finish line first wins. In a time trial scenario (where each participant gets an individual start time), the awards are based strictly on time.

Conclusion

In the world of race event organization, exploring timing technologies and systems can be a strategic move for race directors and organizers. Each alternative has advantages and disadvantages, and can cater to different race scenarios, budgets, and preferences.

Finish Line Timing, with its commitment to providing personalized and reliable timing services, can assist race directors in implementing these alternatives effectively. Finish Line Timing uses the MyLaps BibTag (chip) timing equipment (used by races such as the Boston, Chicago, Houston Marathons and the BolderBoulder). The MyLaps BibTag system offers three chip options: BibTags (the thin chip is attached to the back of a bib or bike plate for cycling), MultiSports bands (for triathlons, open water swims, mud races), and Seat post tags (also for cycling). Finish Line Timing offers tag pull timing for smaller races.

With a focus on eliminating the stress associated with race timing, Finish Line Timing offers race organizers the tools they need to ensure the success and integrity of their events. Contact us to learn more about our electronic chip and tag-pull timing technologies and our other timing services such as live results, live streaming, and results kiosks.

By embracing innovation and exploring timing alternatives, race organizers can enhance the quality and efficiency of their events, ultimately creating a more satisfying experience for participants and achieving greater success for their event.

10/27/2023